This is “The Bigger Picture”, section 9.5 from the book Finance for Managers (v. 0.1). For details on it (including licensing), click here.

For more information on the source of this book, or why it is available for free, please see the project's home page. You can browse or download additional books there. You may also download a PDF copy of this book (2 MB) or just this chapter (102 KB), suitable for printing or most e-readers, or a .zip file containing this book's HTML files (for use in a web browser offline).

Has this book helped you? Consider passing it on:
Creative Commons supports free culture from music to education. Their licenses helped make this book available to you. helps people like you help teachers fund their classroom projects, from art supplies to books to calculators.

9.5 The Bigger Picture

PLEASE NOTE: This book is currently in draft form; material is not final.

Learning Objectives

  1. Describe how bonds fit into the larger picture of finance.
  2. Explain ethical considerations regarding bonds.

Bonds allow entities to borrow money easily from investors. When banks demand too much return or are unwilling to accept more risk, bonds can be the avenue to raising more capital. Corporations (or govenments, municipalities, etc.) can then use the capital raised to invest in new projects or pay for ongoing projects.

As managers, we need to consider how our actions will influence our ability to issue bonds and raise capital. As investors, we need to consider bonds as an investment class.

One side benefit of bond markets is that we can witness the perceived current value of the bond as they trade. From these prices, we can deduce the return demanded by the market, and use this information to learn more about the market (for example, risk tolerance or inflation expectation) or the issuer (for example, perceived risk of default) of the bond.

Ethical Considerations

When issuing bonds, companies have an incentive to look like safe investments, since this will lower the return demanded by the market. Some companies will make decisions based upon how their balance sheet will appear (and how they believe it will affect the rating!) for an upcoming bond issue. The legitamacy of such manipulations can be difficult to distinguish, especially if it is solely a matter of transparency.

Ratings companies are meant to be objective judges of risk, but their revenue comes from fees paid for each bond issue, raising the specter of conflict of interest. Also, while ratings companies also include details about the risk of an issue, many investors fail to look beyond the assigned ratings, despite the potential complexity of some bonds.

Investors need to consider that buying a bond is, in effect, supporting the borrowing of the issuer. If a government is engaging in policies contrary to the conscience of the investor, or a company’s revenue source is objectionable, an investor should consider avoiding the investment.

Key Takeaways

  • Bonds allow entities to raise capital.
  • Companies can try to manipulate perception to influence ratings agencies and potential cost of borrowing.
  • Investors should remember that buying a bond is, at least indirectly, supporting the operations of the corporation, government, etc. that issued the bond.


  1. A large government recently embarked on a campaign of silencing “dissidents”. It periodically issues bonds to fund its debt, which includes food programs for the needy and its military payroll. How might this affect an investor’s decision to buy a bond?
  2. If a bond is purchased on the secondary market, it isn’t directly purchased from the company. Would buying such a bond still be supporting the company’s funding? Why or why not?