This is “Bond Yield”, section 9.3 from the book Finance for Managers (v. 0.1).
This book is licensed under a Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 license. See the license for more details, but that basically means you can share this book as long as you credit the author (but see below), don't make money from it, and do make it available to everyone else under the same terms.
This content was accessible as of December 29, 2012, and it was downloaded then by Andy Schmitz in an effort to preserve the availability of this book.
Normally, the author and publisher would be credited here. However, the publisher has asked for the customary Creative Commons attribution to the original publisher, authors, title, and book URI to be removed. Additionally, per the publisher's request, their name has been removed in some passages. More information is available on this project's attribution page.
For more information on the source of this book, or why it is available for free, please see the project's home page. You can browse or download additional books there. You may also download a PDF copy of this book (2 MB) or just this chapter (102 KB), suitable for printing or most e-readers, or a .zip file containing this book's HTML files (for use in a web browser offline).
PLEASE NOTE: This book is currently in draft form; material is not final.
All investments have a certain amount of risk (even stuffing dollars under your mattress is vulnerable to house fire!), and, in a perfect world, we would be able to completely assess the risk of each investment. There are many employees, companies, and consultants whose entire focus is on evaluating risk. Arguably, all of finance boils down to the study of risk and return.
The value of a bond, like any series of future cash flows, is intrinsically related to the perceived opportunity cost of the investment, as we discussed in Chapter 6 "Time Value of Money: One Cash Flow". This cost, called the real interest rateThe interest rate that only compensates for the perceived opportunity cost of the investment., is determined by the market by causing the price of the bond to rise or fall. When we hear newscasters speaking of “interest rates falling”, what they are really saying is that the relevant bonds have changed in price, exposing a belief by investors that the opportunity costs of holding the bond are going down. So, as a shortcut we can talk about interest rates changing, but we should remember that, ultimately, these rates are derived from the price of the bonds! An investor buying a bond at a certain price point will yield a certain return on her investment; in bond parlance, this expected return is called the bond’s yieldA bond’s expected return.. Specifically, yield to maturity (YTM)The annualized rate of retun on a bond, assuming the bond is held to maturity and all the expected cash flows occur. is the annualized rate of return on a bond, assuming the bond is held to maturity and all the expected cash flows occur.
A bond’s yield is determined by its price, but we often speak of “investors require a yield of 5%”. What we are really saying in this case is that investors will only pay a price for the bond that will give them a 5% return on their money.
If investors determine they need a higher yield, then they won’t be willing to pay as much up front, and bond prices should fall. Thus, as yields rise, prices fall (and vice-versa). Bond prices and yields are inversely related!
Each bond faces a host of additional factors, all of which must be accounted for to properly assess the value of a bond. As time goes by, the purchasing power of a dollar (or whichever unit of currency we are using) could deteriorate; this we call inflationThe deterioration of the purchasing power of a currency.. Opportunity cost and inflation factored together are typically labeled the nominal interest rateThe interest rate that compensates for opportunity cost and inflation factored together..
If both the inflation rate and the real rate of interest are low (that is, < 5% each), then we can safely approximate the nominal interest rate as:
Equation 9.2 Approximate Nominal Interest RateReal Rate of Interest + Inflation Rate ≈ Nominal Rate of Interest
We use r* (pronounced “r-star”) to represent the real rate of interest and π (the Greek letter “pi”), which here is not the circle constant of 3.14, to represent inflation. Why have finance scholars chosen to use π? Because we thought using i would be too confusing, since both “interest” and “inflation” start with the same letter….
This equation has the benefit of being easy to remember and can be used for fairly accurate results. While historically it has been safe to assume a real interest rate at or below 5%, there have been many occurrences of large rates of inflation much larger than 5% throughout the world. When this is the case, it is more prudent to utilize the more accurate Fisher equation for interest rates:
Equation 9.3 Fisher Equation for Interest Rates(1 + Real Rate of Interest) × (1 + Inflation Rate) = (1 + Nominal Rate of Interest)
While a little more cumbersome to remember and use, it is the more accurate, especially if inflation is high.
This combination of the real rate of interest and the inflation rate should be the return required on an asset that is free of any other risks; we call this the risk-free rate of return and designate it: rRF. As of the time of this writing, standard practice is to use US government bonds as a proxy for such a risk-free asset.
We already know of one risk, credit risk, that will cause investors to demand higher yields, but there are many other potential sources of risk. For example, if a bond isn’t likely to be easily tradable, then investors could want higher yields to compensate. All of these will contribute to the investment’s risk premiumThe amount of return required by investors over the risk-free asset., or amount of return required by investors over the risk-free asset.
Equation 9.4 Risk PremiumRequired Rate of Risk-Free Asset + Risk Premium = Required Rate of Asset